The approval of this Law was carried out in record time, even though a company had already been awarded to purchase these devices. In October 2023, months before the law was promulgated, the company ITTI signed an agreement with the National Secretariat of Sports (SND) for an amount of 1,733,000 USD, as revealed by requests for access to public information <\/a>submitted by journalists Leonardo G\u00f3mez <\/a>and Josu\u00e9 Congo<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In this new edition of the campaign, the context has also changed. Since November 2025, Paraguay has a Personal Data Protection Law<\/a>, although its implementation is not expected until late 2027<\/a>. While facial recognition cameras have not yet been installed in football stadiums, the events that occurred after the Supercl\u00e1sico of April 19<\/a> this year led authorities to announce new \u201csecurity\u201d measures<\/a>, including the implementation of these technologies to control access to matches.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In this context, and in coincidence with the FIFA World Cup 2026, from TEDIC we relaunch the campaign to share information and resources that will allow citizens to understand their rights and reflect on the risks of using biometric data at large events. Because security should not mean giving up privacy or other fundamental rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Based on the findings of the research Con Mi Cara No<\/a><\/strong>, we present new material developed by Antonia Bogado Rodas. \u201cBiometric surveillance: facial recognition and human rights in Paraguay\u2019s sporting events<\/a>\u201d<\/em> delves into the use of these technologies, their growing expansion internationally, and the progress recorded in Paraguay regarding the implementation of facial recognition systems.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Through a review of the current legal framework and requests for access to public information submitted to the state institutions involved, the research analyzes how the absence of clear protocols and adequate control mechanisms can affect fundamental rights such as privacy, protection of personal data, freedom of expression, equality, and the presumption of innocence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The study also explains how facial recognition systems work and what sets them apart from traditional video surveillance (CCTV) cameras. While the latter are limited to recording images, facial recognition systems identify and process biometric data in an automated way, enabling new forms of large-scale monitoring and mass identification in real time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Likewise, the research analyzes experiences from countries such as the United Kingdom, Mexico, Uruguay, and Brazil, where implementing these technologies in sporting events has revealed challenges related to identification errors, indiscriminate surveillance, lack of transparency, and the absence of effective oversight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n With this publication, we aim to provide evidence to strengthen the public debate about the limits and risks of facial recognition, promoting an informed discussion about the need to implement security measures that respect citizens\u2019 fundamental rights and do not condition access to recreational spaces on the processing of sensitive biometric data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As part of the strategy to make this conversation more accessible and dynamic, TEDIC updated and reprinted the campaign fanzine Con mi cara n<\/strong><\/a>o<\/strong>. This material, originally developed during the project\u2019s first edition, was reviewed by the team to incorporate the most recent changes in the regulatory framework related to the protection of rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Among the main updates is the approval of the Personal Data Protection Law<\/a>. Although effective implementation is expected for late 2027<\/a>, its promulgation changes the debate landscape regarding biometric surveillance technologies. The existence of this legal framework recognizes the need to establish guarantees for the protection of personal data and reinforces the responsibilities of the State and of the companies tasked with implementing and administering these systems in relation to the processing, storage, and use of the biometric data they collect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n With this update, the fanzine continues to be an outreach tool that brings clear and accessible information to citizens, strengthening the public debate about the risks of biometric surveillance and the importance of protecting our fundamental rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The battle for the right to know which technologies the State uses to watch us has been extensive and persistent. This process began between 2018 and 2019, when the Ministry of the Interior and the National Police installed cameras with facial recognition technology<\/a> in Asunci\u00f3n, integrated into the 911 System. With the rollout of this mass surveillance tool, Maricarmen Sequera, TEDIC\u2019s Executive Director, filed on April 8, 2019 a request for public information <\/a>requiring usage protocols, human rights impact assessments, and details about the processing of personal data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The State\u2019s initial response set the tone of the conflict: it denied the information, citing reasons of \u201cnational security.\u201d This response, considered insufficient and evasive, initiated a strategic litigation stage<\/a> that has continued for years. From our role as a human rights advocacy organization, we maintain that the national security argument cannot be a blank check for uncontrolled technological spying without adequate judicial oversight or public transparency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the face of this refusal, we challenged the secrecy of the information in Paraguayan courts. However, after a process that lasted across different stages for 6 years, the local justice system ultimately rejected our request for a constitutional protection remedy, thereby confirming the denial of the information requested. It was precisely this rejection that closed the door to an internal solution and forced us to escalate the case to seek justice beyond our borders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In June of this year, together with the EFF and CEJIL we filed a petition with the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR)<\/a>. With this action, we sought recognition of the violation of the right of access to public information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The petition to the IACHR aims not only to achieve justice for this specific case, but also to establish a regional precedent. The organizations request that the State be required to adopt mechanisms for active transparency and to conduct mandatory impact assessments before acquiring or implementing any surveillance technology involving artificial intelligence or biometric data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This process underscores that mass surveillance without accountability creates legal insecurity and puts democracy at risk. The struggle continues to ensure that technological progress does not translate into an irreversible erosion of our fundamental rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As part of the outreach strategy to communities directly affected by the implementation of facial recognition systems in stadiums, TEDIC organized an open discussion event<\/a> in Ciudad del Este on biometric surveillance, facial recognition, and digital rights in the football context.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The event was the result of a prior coordination process with local actors, which included meetings and consultations with supporters, researchers, organizations, and community leaders, to better understand the local dynamics and identify the most appropriate methodology to create a space for dialogue. This work made it possible to build an activity tailored to the local context and foster a horizontal conversation among people with different backgrounds and interests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n During the exchange, questions arose about transparency in implementing these systems, protection of personal data, the risks of errors in facial recognition systems, and the lack of clear mechanisms for oversight and accountability. The conversation also helped introduce concepts related to digital rights to people, in many cases, who had not previously engaged with these debates.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The event also gained coverage in local media<\/a>, which expanded the reach of the discussions beyond the event space and placed the issue on Ciudad del Este\u2019s public agenda. This coverage contributed to strengthening the visibility of the campaign #ConMiCaraNo and created new opportunities to discuss the impacts of biometric surveillance in citizens\u2019 everyday lives.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Asunci\u00f3n and the Central Department play a central role in the debate on facial recognition in Paraguay. In this territory, the stadiums with the highest turnout in the country are concentrated, and where the implementation of these technologies<\/a> is expected to begin for controlling access to sporting events. At the same time, it is a space where organized fan groups have historically coexisted with differentiated control and surveillance measures<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As part of the campaign, from TEDIC we promoted a process of outreach with representatives of organized supporters to create a space for exchange about the implementation of facial recognition and its possible implications for the rights of people who attend matches. Although there was initial willingness to participate, the workshop ultimately could not be carried out due to internal issues within the group with which we were coordinating.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Beyond the fact that the activity was not ultimately carried out, the process made it possible to identify some challenges for future advocacy actions. As explained by Paulo Gonz\u00e1lez, a sociologist who coordinates and works with these groups, the people who make up organized supporters\u2019 groups have been living for years alongside police controls, identification procedures, and other forms of surveillance in stadiums. In that context, facial recognition is not always perceived as a new threat, but rather as a continuation of practices against which these groups constantly deploy strategies to deal with institutional control exercised by actors such as the Police and the Public Prosecutor\u2019s Office.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the same time, taking advantage of the atmosphere created by the FIFA World Cup and the meeting spaces that formed in downtown Asunci\u00f3n to keep watching the matches, we went out to talk with fans and soccer supporters about the implementation of facial recognition in Paraguayan stadiums. In a context in which the National Police and the Ministry of the Interior are moving forward with preparations to roll out these technologies ahead of the restart of the Clausura tournament, we distributed fanzines, exchanged thoughts on the issue, and recorded some of the main reflections to share later on our social networks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The experience in Asunci\u00f3n reaffirmed the importance of continuing to create spaces for dialogue with different actors connected to football and of bringing the debate on biometric surveillance to the places where these technologies will begin to form part of the everyday experience of thousands of people. Listening to the perceptions of those who attend stadiums and understanding how surveillance and stigmatization trajectories influence how these measures are received will make it possible to strengthen future advocacy strategies and promote an informed public debate about the limits and safeguards that must accompany any security policy based on the processing of biometric data.<\/p>\n\n\n\nNew evidence on biometric surveillance in Paraguay<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.tedic.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/mockup-vigilancia-estadios-e1778617243226.png\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\nA practical resource to understand what\u2019s at stake<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The long road to transparency: The case of facial recognition in Paraguay<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
The debate reached Ciudad del Este<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.tedic.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/CONMICARANO1.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.tedic.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/CONMICARANO2.jpeg\")
<\/figure>\n<\/figure>\n\n\n\nAction in Asunci\u00f3n: dialoguing with those who will be on the front lines<\/h2>\n\n\n\n